<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Library degrees a mixed bag?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lackoftalent.org/michael/blog/2007/09/18/library-degrees-a-mixed-bag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lackoftalent.org/michael/blog/2007/09/18/library-degrees-a-mixed-bag/</link>
	<description>The occasional rambling of a digital library artisan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:08:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nicole Engard</title>
		<link>http://lackoftalent.org/michael/blog/2007/09/18/library-degrees-a-mixed-bag/comment-page-1/#comment-46987</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole Engard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lackoftalent.org/michael/blog/2007/09/18/library-degrees-a-mixed-bag/#comment-46987</guid>
		<description>Very good points!  At Drexel they did split the school media people out from the rest of us - so that&#039;s a plus I guess.  They also offered optional tracks - which I did not follow.  For me, I wanted the mixed bag.  I had worked in the library for 5+ years and knew that I wanted to work in a department with an IT focus.  That means I have to know a little bit about everything - otherwise how can I work with people in different departments?

As for a clear vision - here! here!

I think that being &quot;ALA Accredited&quot; has to mean that there is something standard across the board.  I also think that vision has to change from generation to generation (or maybe more).  One of my textbooks was from the early 90s - and informed me that I needed AOL and a phone line to get on the Internet - are you kidding me???  

I&#039;m just ranting now - so I&#039;ll stop. I agree with you and I hope to see some changes because the new librarians aren&#039;t any more prepared than their predecessors were for the changes that are happening around us - library school should prepare us a bit - not just show us the theory and throw us to the wolves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good points!  At Drexel they did split the school media people out from the rest of us &#8211; so that&#039;s a plus I guess.  They also offered optional tracks &#8211; which I did not follow.  For me, I wanted the mixed bag.  I had worked in the library for 5+ years and knew that I wanted to work in a department with an IT focus.  That means I have to know a little bit about everything &#8211; otherwise how can I work with people in different departments?</p>
<p>As for a clear vision &#8211; here! here!</p>
<p>I think that being &#034;ALA Accredited&#034; has to mean that there is something standard across the board.  I also think that vision has to change from generation to generation (or maybe more).  One of my textbooks was from the early 90s &#8211; and informed me that I needed AOL and a phone line to get on the Internet &#8211; are you kidding me???  </p>
<p>I&#039;m just ranting now &#8211; so I&#039;ll stop. I agree with you and I hope to see some changes because the new librarians aren&#039;t any more prepared than their predecessors were for the changes that are happening around us &#8211; library school should prepare us a bit &#8211; not just show us the theory and throw us to the wolves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
