<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>τεχνοσοφια &#187; Active Directory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lackoftalent.org/michael/blog/category/systems/windows/active-directory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lackoftalent.org/michael/blog</link>
	<description>The occasional rambling of a digital library artisan</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Access-based Enumeration &#38; Windows Server 2003 R2</title>
		<link>http://lackoftalent.org/michael/blog/2005/12/08/access-based-enumeration-windows-server-2003-r2/</link>
		<comments>http://lackoftalent.org/michael/blog/2005/12/08/access-based-enumeration-windows-server-2003-r2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 03:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Giarlo</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Active Directory]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Systems]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lackoftalent.org/michael/blog/2005/12/08/access-based-enumeration-windows-server-2003-r2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
As of the SP1 release, Windows Server 2003 now supports access-based enumeration of file shares. Basically, files and folders to which users lack access will not be visible within file shares. No more double-clicking shared resources only to be greeted with &#8220;Access denied.&#8221; This is quite a nice feature, and one which is long overdue.
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/techinfo/overview/abe.mspx
Also, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<abbr class="unapi-id" title="oai:lackoftalent.org:technosophia:19"><!-- &nbsp; --></abbr>
<p>As of the SP1 release, Windows Server 2003 now supports access-based enumeration of file shares. Basically, files and folders to which users lack access will not be visible within file shares. No more double-clicking shared resources only to be greeted with &#8220;Access denied.&#8221; This is quite a nice feature, and one which is long overdue.</p>
<p>http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/techinfo/overview/abe.mspx</p>
<p>Also, the new release of Windows Server 2003 R2 appears to have a number of new features that were not included in SP1 (and that probably will not be featured in SP2). As far as I can figure out, R2 is related to 2003 SP1 as NT4 Option Pack was related to NT4.</p>
<p>http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/r2/whatsnewinr2.mspx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lackoftalent.org/michael/blog/2005/12/08/access-based-enumeration-windows-server-2003-r2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Problems joining a Windows 2003 Active Directory domain</title>
		<link>http://lackoftalent.org/michael/blog/2005/11/30/problems-joining-a-windows-2003-active-directory-domain/</link>
		<comments>http://lackoftalent.org/michael/blog/2005/11/30/problems-joining-a-windows-2003-active-directory-domain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 01:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Giarlo</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Active Directory]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lackoftalent.org/michael/blog/2005/11/30/problems-joining-a-windows-2003-active-directory-domain/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
One of the first tasks that has been assigned to me is the installation and configuration of a pair of network load-balanced Terminal Servers running Windows Server 2003. The department has already cobbled together documentation on how to build servers within the locally developed and recognized best practices, and I am loath to deviate from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<abbr class="unapi-id" title="oai:lackoftalent.org:technosophia:9"><!-- &nbsp; --></abbr>
<p>One of the first tasks that has been assigned to me is the installation and configuration of a pair of network load-balanced Terminal Servers running Windows Server 2003. The department has already cobbled together documentation on how to build servers within the locally developed and recognized best practices, and I am loath to deviate from these in my first month of employment. I got up to the point of joining the first TS node (&#8221;TS1&#8243;) to the AD domain pretty smoothly. When I attempted to move TS1 out of its workgroup and into the domain, I was prompted for a password (which is a good thing, and is to be expected).  When I attempted to use my domain admin account in the form &#8220;DOMAIN\account&#8221;, I was rudely greeted with an &#8220;unknown username or bad password&#8221; error.  When I tried to provide my credentials in the form of &#8220;account@domain.university.edu&#8221;, I received the unfamiliar &#8220;Element not found&#8221; message.</p>
<p>After poking around for a few hours, I came up with the following fix:</p>
<ol>
<li>The administrative account being used to join the server to the domain must be allowed logon rights on the server being added. This must be done on the domain controller.</li>
<li>NTLM v2 authentication must be enabled in the Local Security Policy of the new server. Go to Administrative Tools / Local Security Policy and navigate to Security Settings / Local Policies / Security Options. In the right-hand pane, locate the policy named Network security : LAN Manager authentication level and change its value to Send NTLMv2 response only. (Note: I am unsure what other repercussions might be caused by changing this setting.)</li>
</ol>
<p>These steps might not work for you, as they were likely necessary in my environment due to networking and domain configuration particulars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lackoftalent.org/michael/blog/2005/11/30/problems-joining-a-windows-2003-active-directory-domain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
